- Adedoyin, O.O., (2011). The Impact In-Depth Pedagogical Mathematical Content Knowledge on Academic Performance: As Perceived By Botswana Junior Secondary School Pupils. University of Botswana: European Journal of Educational Studies 3(2),Retrieved on Dec.05, 2015 from http://www.ozelacademy.com/EJES_v3n2_10.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Adunola, O. (2011). An Analysis of the Relationship between Class Size and Academic Performance of Students. Ego Booster Book :Ogun State, Nigeria. [Google Scholar]
- ALISTER JONES and JUDY MORELAND(2004). Enhancing Practicing Primary School Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge in TechnologyInternational Journal of Technology and Design Education 14, 121–140. [Google Scholar]
- Allexander Muzenda (2013). Lecturers’ Competences and Students’ Academic Performance.International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722. [Google Scholar]
- Ball, D. L. (1990).Halves, pieces, and twoths: Constructing representational contexts in teaching fractions (Craft Paper No. 90‐2). East Lansing: Michigan StateUniversity, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. [Google Scholar]
- Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject matter knowledge part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research onteaching: Vol. 2. Teachersʹ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to theirteaching practice (pp. 1—48). Greenwich, CT: JAI. [Google Scholar]
- Ball, D. L. (1999). Crossing boundaries to examine the mathematics entailed in elementary teaching. Contemporary Mathematics, 243, 15—36. [Google Scholar]
- Ball, D. L. (2000).Bridging practices: Intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach.Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 241—247. [Google Scholar]
- Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachersʹ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433—456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar]
- Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Voss, (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Education Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. [Google Scholar]
- Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L, & Cocking R.R. (Eds). (1999-2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
- Brunning R, Schraw G, Ronning R (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction (3rd Ed.).Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
- Carmen FERNANDEZ (2014). Knowledge Base for Teaching and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and Some Useful Models and Implica¬tions for Teachers’ Training: problems of Education in the 21st Century, Volume 60. [Google Scholar]
- Carpenter, T.P. (1988).Teaching as problem solving. Reston, VA. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Y. (2010). Students’ Perceptions of Teaching Styles and Use of Learning Strategies, Retrieved from: http://trace.tennessee.udu/utk grades/. [Google Scholar]
- Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263— 272. [Google Scholar]
- Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263—272. [Google Scholar]
- Craig, H. J., Kraft, R. J., & Du Plessis, J. (1998). Teacher development: Making an impact. Washington DC: USAID and World Bank. [Google Scholar]
- Cress well John W.(2012). Educational Research: planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitatative and Qualitative research. 4th ed. Bolyston street: Boston. [Google Scholar]
- Dapaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systmatic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 12-25. [Google Scholar]
- David Orr et al.(2013). Pedagogy, Curriculum, teaching Practices and Teachers Education. USA. [Google Scholar]
- Dewey, J. (1969). The logical and psychological aspects of experience: Theory of knowledge and problems of education. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar]
- Duschl, R. A. & Gitomer, D. H.(1997). ‘Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms’, Educational Assessment 4(1), 37–73. [Google Scholar]
- Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2002). Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. 4th Ed. Needham Heights: M.A. [Google Scholar]
- Ehindero, OJ, Ajibade YA (2000). What our student say about how weteach. Ife J. Educ. Studies.7(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar]
- Genet G. and Haftu H(2014).Correctional Education Teachers’ Teaching Competence. Ethiop. J. Educ. & Sc. Vol. 9 [Google Scholar]
- Gess‐Newsome, J. (1999a). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess‐Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Pedagogical content knowledge and science education: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3—17). Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- Gess‐Newsome, J. (1999b). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction.In J. Gess‐Newsome & N. G. [Google Scholar]
- Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. B. (Eds.) (1999).PCK: How teachers transform subject matter knowledge. J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. (pp. 51-94). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
- Glenda Anthon and Margaret Walshaw, (2009.Effective pedagogy in subject teaching.International Academy of Education (IAE) ፡ Geneva 20, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- Gooyeon Kim (2004). The Pedagogical Content Knowledge Of Two Middle‐SchoolMathematics Teachers: A Dissertation Submitted To The Graduate Faculty Of The University Of Georgia In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree. Athens: Georgia. [Google Scholar]
- Grimmet, P., & MacKinnon, A. (1992).Craft knowledge and the education of Teachers.In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education, (18) (pp. 59-74). Washington, DC: AERA. [Google Scholar]
- Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University. [Google Scholar]
- Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
- Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. New York: Pergamon. [Google Scholar]
- Grossman, P., Wilson, S., & Shulman, L. (1989). Teachers for substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teachers (pp. 23-36). London: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
- Harlen, W. & James, M.(1997,)‘Assessment and Learning: Differences and Relationships Between Formative and Summative Assessment’, Assessment in Education 4(3), 365–379. [Google Scholar]
- Hayes, G. & Chamberlain, R.: (1998), Improving Literacy in the Primary School; Routledge, London. [Google Scholar]
- Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2004).Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.American Educational Research Journal, 42 (2), 371– 406. [Google Scholar]
- Hill, H.C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D.L. (2005).Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406. [Google Scholar]
- Howie (2002. Evaluating students achievement with different contexts. In Prospects, XXXV(1), Paris: International Bureau of Education: UNSCO. [Google Scholar]
- Kahan, J. A., Cooper, D. A., & Bethea, K. A. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 223—252. [Google Scholar]
- Kang’ahi, M., Indoshi, F.C., Okwach, T.O. & Osido, J. (2012). Teaching Styles and Learners’ Achievement . International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(3):62-87. [Google Scholar]
- Kang’ahi, M., Indoshi, F.C., Okwach, T.O. & Osido, J. (2012). Teaching Styles and Learners’ Achievement, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1(3):62-87. [Google Scholar]
- Kenneth N. Ross (2005): Quantitative research methods in educational Planning: Sample design for educational survey research, International Institute for Educational Planning/UNESCO. [Google Scholar]
- Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress, Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204. [Google Scholar]
- Lampert, M. (1991).Connecting mathematical teaching and learning. In E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter & S. J. Lamon (Eds.), Integrating research on teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 121‐152). Albany: State University of New York. [Google Scholar]
- Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., & Möller, K. (2012). Elementary Teachers` Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Student Achievement in Science Education: Science Learning and Citizenship. Proceedings of the Ninth ESERA-Conference. Lyon. [Google Scholar]
- Lederman (Eds.), Pedagogical content knowledge and science education: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 51—94). Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 247—271. [Google Scholar]
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. The construct and its implications for science education (Vol. 6, pp. 95-132). [Google Scholar]
- Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3–11. [Google Scholar]
- Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1998).Evaluating technology-based processes and products.New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 69–77. [Google Scholar]
- Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers' knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (fourth ed., pp. 877-904). Washington: American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar]
- Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachersʹ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877—904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. [Google Scholar]
- Mushashu, B.K. (1997). Quality of education in public secondary schools: Major problems andsolutions. Paper presented at the conference on quality of education in Tanzania, Arusha. [Google Scholar]
- Paliakoff A. & Schwartzbeck T.D. (Eds). (2001). Eye of the storm: Promising practices for improving instruction. Washington D.C.: CBE. [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, P. L. (1988). Teachers’ and students’ cognitional knowledge of classroom teaching and learning.Educational Researcher, 17(5), 5—14. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. (1997a). Professional development: Learning from experience. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4—14. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-36). New York, NY: Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), pp. 4-14. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), pp. 1-22. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1—22. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S. (2000). Teacher development: Roles of domain expertise and pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 129— 135. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S., & Grossman, P. (1988). Knowledge growth in teaching: Stanford, CA: Stanford University. [Google Scholar]
- Shulman, L. S., & Sykes, G. (1986).A national board for teaching?In search of a bold standard.A report for the task force on teaching as a profession. New York. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1—20. [Google Scholar]
- Taconis, R., Jochems,W. Rohaan, E.J., (2010). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in primary technology education.Research in Science and Technological Education, 27(3), 327–338. [Google Scholar]
- Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education.Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 99—110. [Google Scholar]
- Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999).Pedagogical Content Knowledge Taxonomies.Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). [Google Scholar]
- Voss, T., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedagogical/ psychological knowledge: Test construction and validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 952-969. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987)."150 different ways of knowing".Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking(pp. 104-123). Eastbourne, England: Cassell. [Google Scholar]
- Wineburg, S., & Wilson, S. M. (1991).The subject matter knowledge of history teachers.In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, 2, 305-345. Greenwich CT: JAI Press. [Google Scholar]
|