International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1308-951X
International Journal of Research in Teacher Education
International Association of Educators

Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2019, Vol. 10(4) 50-67

Student Teachers' Views of Science Microteaching: Experiences, Abilities, and Reflective Feedback

Ayhan Cinici, Jazlin Ebenezer & Gülden Gürsoy

pp. 50 - 67   |  Manu. Number: MANU-1908-28-0002

Published online: December 31, 2019  |   Number of Views: 234  |  Number of Download: 877

Save PDF

Abstract

The aim of this qualitative case study was to investigate primary student teachers’ views of microteaching with respect to their experiences; development of teaching abilities; and mentors and peers’ feedbacks. Thirty-six student teachers participated in this study. They were equally divided into six heterogeneous groups with six in each group. Each group of student teachers performed three science microteaching cycles during a period of twelve weeks. Data sources consisted of student teachers’ reflective structured-journals and verbatim transcripts of semi-structured interviews. The student teachers took the feedback seriously and struggled to improve their teaching practices in subsequent microteaching sessions. Based on their reflections, student teachers stressed the critical role of receiving constructive feedback to improve their own science teaching and to become more reflective thinkers. On the other hand, most student teachers interestingly stated that there was no need to improve themselves in terms of the art of questioning and stressed that they felt completely at ease with it. They also regarded the skill of “measurement and evaluation” as less important than other teaching skills. However, fostering the skill of question-posing is considered very important for the development of high-order thinking skills. The possible reasons for this naïve perception were discussed.

Keywords: Feedback; Microteaching; Reflective practice, Reflective thinkers, Student teachers

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Cinici, A., Ebenezer, J. & Gursoy, G. (2019). Student Teachers' Views of Science Microteaching: Experiences, Abilities, and Reflective Feedback . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 10(4), 50-67.

Harvard
Cinici, A., Ebenezer, J. and Gursoy, G. (2019). Student Teachers' Views of Science Microteaching: Experiences, Abilities, and Reflective Feedback . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 10(4), pp. 50-67.

Chicago 16th edition
Cinici, Ayhan, Jazlin Ebenezer and Gulden Gursoy (2019). "Student Teachers' Views of Science Microteaching: Experiences, Abilities, and Reflective Feedback ". International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 10 (4):50-67.

References
  1. Abell, S. K., & Cennamo, K. S. (2004). Videocases in elementary science teacher preparation. Advances in research on teaching, 10, 103-130. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its [Google Scholar]
  3. origin in the student secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 633-653. [Google Scholar]
  4. Askarizadeh, A. & Wan Mansor, W. F. A. (2011). The role of reflection in the network-based microteaching. Journal of Edupres, 7(September), 49-54. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bain, J. D., Mills, C., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Developing reflection on practice through journal writing: Impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers and Teaching, 8(2), 171-196. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bower, M., Cavanagh, M., Moloney, R., & Dao, M. (2011). Developing communication competence using an online Video Reflection system: student teachers’ experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 311-326. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boz, B. & Adnan, M. (2017). How do freshman engineering students reflect an online calculus course? International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 5(4), 262-278. DOI:10.18404/ijemst.83046. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brouwera, N., Besselink, E., & Oosterheert I. (2017). The power of video feedback with structured viewing guides. Teaching and Teacher Education 66, 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  9. Butler, D.L., & Winne, P.h. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell-Evans, G., & Maloney, C. (1998). An analysis framework for reflective writing. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 29-38. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, M.W.T. & Chan, C.K.Y. (2019). An experimental test: Using rubrics for reflective writing to develop reflection. Studies in Educational Evaluation 61 176-182. Doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.001. [Google Scholar]
  12. Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2017). Video use in teacher education: An international survey of practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 22-35. [Google Scholar]
  13. Author. (2013). xxx. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology xx, xx.  [Google Scholar]
  14. Author. (2016a). xxxx. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning xx, xx.  [Google Scholar]
  15. Author. (2016b). xxx. International Journal of Science Education, xx, xx.  [Google Scholar]
  16. Chawla, V., & Thukral P. (2011). Effects of student feedback on teaching competence of student teachers: A microteaching experiment. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(1), 77-87. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chetcuti, D. (2007). The use of portfolios as a reflective learning tool in initial teacher education: A Maltese case study. Reflective Practice, 8(1), 137-149. [Google Scholar]
  18. Convery, A. (1998). A teacher’s response to ‘Reflection-in-action’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(2), 197-205. [Google Scholar]
  19. Davis, S. E., & Dargusch, J. M. (2015). Feedback, Iterative Processing and Academic Trust - Teacher Education Students' Perceptions of Assessment Feedback. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 177-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n1.10 [Google Scholar]
  20. Demulder, E. K., & Rigsby, L. C. (2003). Teachers’ voices on reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 4(3), 267- 290. [Google Scholar]
  21. Diezmann, C.M., & Watters, J.J. (2006). Structuring reflection as a tool in qualitative evaluation. Paper presented at HECU Conference, 24-26th July 2006, Lancaster, UK. [Google Scholar]
  22. Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2011). Towards productive reflective practice in microteaching. Innovations in Education and Training International, 48(3), 335-346. [Google Scholar]
  23. Eksi, G. (2012). Implementing an observation and feedback form for more effective feedback in microteaching. Education and Science, 37(164), 267-282. [Google Scholar]
  24. Erdogan, I., & Campell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891-1914. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 37-47. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ferraro, J. M. (2000). Reflective practice and professional development. ERIC Digest ED449120. Retrieved January 28, 2014, from http://searcheric.org/digests/ ed449120. html. [Google Scholar]
  27. Francis, D. (1995). The reflective journal: A window to student teachers’ practical knowledge. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(3), 229-241. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301-325. [Google Scholar]
  29. Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel Araştırmaya Giriş (Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 4th edition) (1. Baskı), (Çev.) Ali Ersoy ve Pelin Yalçınoğlu, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  30. Griffiths, V. (2000). The reflective dimension in teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(5), 539-555. [Google Scholar]
  31. I'anson J., Rodrigues, S., & Wilson, G. (2003). Mirrors, reflections and refractions: The contribution of microteaching to reflective practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 189-199. [Google Scholar]
  32. Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L., & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 287-308. [Google Scholar]
  33. Korthagen, F. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kozan, K. & Ata, A. (2019). A construct validity study of a measure of pre-service teachers' micro-teaching performance. Akdeniz Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 13(27), 547-558. doi: 10.29329/mjer.2019.185.26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  35. Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of video tape recording in microteaching training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 483-486. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuswandono, P. (2014). University mentors’ views on reflective practice in microteaching: building trust and genuine feedback, Reflective Practice, 15(6), 701-717.  [Google Scholar]
  37. Lazarus, E., & Olivero F. (2009). Videopapers as a tool for reflection on practice in initial teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 255-267. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.  [Google Scholar]
  39. Loughran, J., & Corrigan, D. (1995). Teaching portfolios: a strategy for developing learning and teaching in student education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(6), 565-577. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lumpe, A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J., & Beltyukova, S. (2012). Beliefs about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153-166. [Google Scholar]
  41. Marcos, J. M., Sanchez, E. & Tillema, H. H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: what is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 37(1), 21-36.  [Google Scholar]
  42. McMillan, J., H., & Schumacher S. (2010). Research in Education 7th edition. Boston: Allen & Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  43. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analyze. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moate, J.,  Hulse, B., Jahnke, H. & Owens, A. (2019). Exploring the material mediation of dialogic space: A qualitative analysis of professional learning in initial teacher education based on reflective sketchbooks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 167-178. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.003. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 10(2), 205-217. [Google Scholar]
  46. Parasurama, D. (2019). An attitude of secondary teacher trainees towards microteaching: Does teaching experience, subject background and marital status matter? International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 10(2), 75-81. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pleschova ́, G. & McAlpine, L. (2016). Helping teachers to focus on learning and reflect on their teaching: What role does teaching context play? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 1-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.10.002. [Google Scholar]
  48. Race, P. (2001). The lecturer’s toolkit: A practical guide to learning, teaching and assessment. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ruiz-Primo, M.A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37(1), 15-24. Doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203-2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  51. Savage, L. B. (1998). Eliciting Critical Thinking Skills through Questioning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 7(5), 291-293. [Google Scholar]
  52. Schempp, P. G., Manross, D., Tan, S. K. S., & Fincher, M. D. (1998). Subject expertise and teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(3), 342-356. [Google Scholar]
  53. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 56-65. [Google Scholar]
  54. Stacey, K., Helme, S., Steinle, V., Baturo, A., Irwin, K., & Bana, J. (2001). Student teachers’ knowledge of difficulties in decimal numeration. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(3), 205-225. [Google Scholar]
  55. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedure and Techniques. Sage, NewburyPark, London.   [Google Scholar]
  56. Walshe,  N., Driver P. (2019). Developing reflective trainee teacher practice with 360-degree video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 97-105. Doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.009. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yoon, H-G., & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 283-301. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yoon, H-G., Kim, M., Sug-Kim, B., Jae-Joung, Y., & Shin-Park, Y. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ views of inquiry teaching and their responses to teacher educators’ feedback on teaching Practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(4), 347-359.  [Google Scholar]
  59. Youens, B., Smethem, L., & Sullivan, S. (2014). Promoting collaborative practice and reciprocity in initial teacher education: realising a ‘dialogic space’ through video capture analysis. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 40(2), 101-113. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yuksel, I., (2011). The Effects of Post-Observational Reflective Feedback Modes on Teaching Beliefs: Peer vs. Teacher-Mediated Feedback. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 2(1), 38-56. [Google Scholar]
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 10 Issue 4

December 2019

All Articles

International Journal of Research in Teacher Education

International Association of Educators.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License.
Privacy policy     |     Terms of Use     |     Use of Cookies
Creative Commons Lisansı
© 2012 - 2024 - THDSoft e-Journal Management System.