International Association of Educators   |  ISSN: 1308-951X

Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2022, Vol. 13(3) 27-37

Innovative Thinking Tendencies of Middle School Students in the Light of Different Variables

Nur Akcanca

pp. 27 - 37   |  Manu. Number: MANU-2209-19-0001

Published online: September 26, 2022  |   Number of Views: 82  |  Number of Download: 288


Adapting to today's world which is in constant change is directly related to the adoption of an innovative understanding. Gaining this innovative perspective also constitutes the primary aim of education. Developing innovative thinking skills of students, especially at their early ages, is also considered important to shape their future lives. In order to develop these mentioned skills, first of all, it is necessary to determine the current innovative thinking tendencies of the students and to clearly reveal their relationship with different variables. Starting from this point of view, the aim of this study was settled as determining the innovative thinking tendencies of middle school students and revealing their relationship with different variables. This study that corresponds with the survey model was conducted with 356 middle school students (5th-8th grades). Innovative Thinking Tendency Scale was used as a data collection tool in the research. The sub-dimensions of the scale are innovative self-efficacy, openness to innovation, innovative problem solving, innovative perseverance and innovative group leadership. Mann Whitney-u and Kruskal Wallis tests, which are from non-parametric tests, were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the research, while no significant difference was detected between students' innovative thinking tendencies and sub-dimensions, gender, grade level, and students' receiving awards; significant differences were found between the number of siblings, family income levels and academic grade point averages. In addition, it is among the results obtained from the research that students' innovative thinking tendencies are at a moderate level. Within the scope of the results obtained from the research, it is recommended to compare the educational experiences to be carried out with different teaching techniques and methods in order to constantly renew the educational conditions and to support the innovative thinking tendencies of the students.

Keywords: Innovative thinking skills, Innovative thinking tendencies, Middle school students

How to Cite this Article?

APA 6th edition
Akcanca, N. (2022). Innovative Thinking Tendencies of Middle School Students in the Light of Different Variables . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 13(3), 27-37.

Akcanca, N. (2022). Innovative Thinking Tendencies of Middle School Students in the Light of Different Variables . International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 13(3), pp. 27-37.

Chicago 16th edition
Akcanca, Nur (2022). "Innovative Thinking Tendencies of Middle School Students in the Light of Different Variables ". International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 13 (3):27-37.

  1. Adıgüzel, A., Kaya, A., Balay, R. & Göçen, A. (2014). The relationship between teacher candidates’ individual innovativeness and their learning attitudes. The Journal of National Education, 43(204), 135-154. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aras, B. (2020). Investigation of secondary school student's innovative thinking levels in terms of various variables (Afyonkarahisar sampling) (Unpublished Master Thesis). Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyon. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aydemir, A. (2021). Social innovation and lateral thinking tendencies of preservice social studies teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(3), 250-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Çamlıbel Çakmak, Ö. (2012). Examining the relationship between pre-school teacher candidates' attitudes towards science education and understanding levels of science concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(3), 40-51. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  5. Demirel, Y. & Seçkin, Z. (2008). The impact of knowledge and knowledge sharing on innovation. The Journal of Institute of Social Sciences of Çukurova University, 11(1), 189-202. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  6. Deveci, İ. & Kavak, S. (2020). Innovativeness perceptions and innovative thinking tendencies of middle school students: An exploratory sequential design. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 346-378. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  7. Gök, S. B. (2021). Reflections of the science-based enterprise training modules integrated with 5e learning cycle on the seven grade students' the innovative thinking tendencies (Unpublished Master Thesis). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş. [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnston, R. E. & Bate, J. D. (2003), The power of strategy innovation: A new way of linking creativity and strategic planning to discover great business opportunities, New York: AMACOM [Google Scholar]
  9. Karasar, N. (2022). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (37. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kılıçer, K. (2011). Individual innovativeness profiles of prospective teachers in computer education and instructional technology (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir. [Google Scholar]
  11. Koçak, B. (2018). Social studies pre-service teachers' perceptions about the concept of innovation. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies, 1(2), 80-87. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  12. Koştur, H. İ. (2019). Identifying preservice primary school teachers' views on science education. Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 144-154. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  13. Mısırlı, Z.A. (2015). Investigation of secondary school students’ competencies regarding educational technology standards. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 5, 311-337. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  14. Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Science Course Curriculum (Primary and Secondary School 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8). Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  15. Muradoğlu, B. (2020). Secondary school students' perceptions and indicators of innovativeness in science courses (Unpublished Master Thesis). Trabzon University, Trabzon. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mykhailyshyn, H., Kondur, O. & Serman, L. (2018). Innovation of education and educational innovations in conditions of modern higher education institution. Journal of Vasyl Stefanuk Precappathian National University, 5(1), 9-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  17. Oktuğ, Z. & Özden, M. S. (2013). The moderating role of intrinsic motivation on the relationship between individualism/collectivism and individual innovativeness. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(2), 1-22. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  18. Özdil Aydın, E. Ö. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transformational leadership and gender (Unpublished Master Thesis). Ankara University, Ankara. [Google Scholar]
  19. Öztürk Fidan, İ. & Fidan, T. (2017, October). The mediating role of intrinsic motivation in the effect of extrinsic motivation on innovativeness and the differential effect of uncertainty. International Education Management Forum (EYFOR8), Ankara, Türkiye. [Google Scholar]
  20. P21, Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2015). P21 Framework Definitions. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  21. Sokolov, K. O., Sergeicheva, I. A. & Sokolova, M. I. (2020, April). Innovative thinking development in engineers. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1515, No. 2, p. 022012). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  22. Şanlı, S. (2020). Evaluation of middle school social studies textbooks in the context of innovative thinking (Unpublished Master Thesis). Akdeniz University, Antalya. [Google Scholar]
  23. Taş, S. (2017). Innovation, education and global innovation index. Bilge International Journal of Social Research, 1(1), 99-123. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  24. Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297-326. 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  25. Wisetsat, C. & Nuangchalerm, P. (2019). Enhancing innovative thinking of Thai preservice teachers through multi-educational innovations. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 409-419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]