Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2020, Vol. 11(4) 16-31
pp. 16 - 31 | Manu. Number: ijrte.2020.008
Published online: December 29, 2020 | Number of Views: 44 | Number of Download: 394
The purpose of the study was to identify the extent of staff involvement in research, to underline the nature of communication among the existing staff through research (academic and administrative), and mark the extent to which research serves the transformative vision vested in the Ethiopian universities, in line with the higher education proclamation 650/2009. A descriptive survey design was used in the research since the study focused on status analysis regarding research productivity. For the materialization of the research, data were collected from teachers and top administrative officials who were concerned with research matters. The findings denoted that, though the staff had enormous research skills and considerably long years of services, they did not produce research owing, largely, to lack of initiative at institutional level, heavy task-load to some extent, and lack of good incentives and initiation to the most. The research is expected to be significant for teachers and students in higher educational institutions in Ethiopia as it embarks upon the productivity of research as a innovative means. It also marks the way research resources must be utilized other than the ceremonial undertaking most institutions hold. So, it underlines the concern behind use of research resources to come up with fertile findings which an bring about workable achievements.
Keywords: Personal, Institutional, Determinants, Research Productivity, Higher Education
|How to Cite this Article?|
APA 6th edition
Chicago 16th edition
Abramo, G. & D’Angelo, C.A. (2014). How do You Define and Measure Research Productivity. Budapest: Akademia Kiado.
Abu-Zidan, F.M. & Risk, D.E. E. (2005). Research in Developing Countries: Problems and Solutions. [Retrieved in : www.download.springer.com ].
Adama Science and Technology University Five-Years Strategic Plan. (2011/2012). [Retrieved in : http://www.slideshare.net/biruktesfa/astu-5-year-strategic-plan-final].
Bay, B. E. & Clerigo, M.E.C. (2009). Factors Associated with Research Productivity among Oral Healthcare Educators in an Asian University. [Retrieved in: https://www.questia.com].
Bland, C. J. (2005). A Theoretical, Practical, Predictive Model of Faculty and Department Research Productivity. [Retrieved in: http://www2.massgeneral.org/
Bulterman-Bos, J. (2008). Relevance in Education Research: Will Clinical Approach Make Education Research More Relevant for Practice? [Retrieved in: http://www.che.nl/~/media/Academie... ].
David, Q. (2014). Determinants of Research Production at top US Universities. [Retrieved in: www.solvay.edu].
Dundar, H. & Lewis, D.R. (1998). Determinants of Research Productivity in Higher Education. Research in Higher Education, Vol.39, No.6. [Retrieved in : www.download-vz.springer.com].
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. (2009). Higher Education Proclamation ( 650/2009). Negarit Gazeta. Addis Ababa: Berhanena Selam.
Gibb, A. (2009). The importance of research on research. [Retrieved in:file:///C:/Users/HP/Desktop/The%20importance ].
Goodall, A.H., mCDowell, J.M. & Singell, L.D. (2014). Leadership and the Research Producivity of University Departments. Institute for the Study of Labour. [Retrieved in: http://ftp.iza.org/dp7903.pdf].
Gonzalez-Brambila, C. (2005). The Determinants of Research Productivity : a study of Mexican Researchers . [Retrieved in: www.globelicsacademy.net/2005pdf/L14_paper.pd].
Heggen, K., Karseth, B. & Kyvik, S. (2010). The Relevance of Research for the Improvement of Education and Professional Practice. [Retrieved in: http://link.springer.com/chapter/].
Hine, G.C. (2013). The Importance of Action Research in Teacher Education. [Retrieved in: www.iier.org.au].
Iqbal, M.Z. & Mahmood, A. (2011). Factors Related to low research productivity at higher education level. [Retrieved in: www.ccsenet.org/ass].
Jung, Jisun. (2012). Faculty Research Productivity in Hong Kong across academic Discipline.[Retrieved in: http://dx.doi.org].
Kotrlik, J. W., Bartlett, J.E., Higgins, C.H. & Williams, H.A. (2002). Factors Associated with Research Productivity of Agricultural Education Faculty. [Retrieved in: www.jae-online.org].
Lertputtarak, S. (2008). An Investigation of Factors Related to Research Productivity in a Public University in Thailand: A Case Study. [Retrieved in: www.core.ac.uk].
McGill, M.M. & Seattle, A. (2012). Identifying Effects of Institutional Resources and Support on Computing Faculty Research Productivity, Tenure, and Promotion. [Retrieved in: www.ijds.org].
Meek, V.L., Teicher, U. & Kearney, M. Eds. (2009). Higher Education, Research and Innovation: Changing Dynamics. [Retrieved in: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001830/183071E.pdf] .
Maassen, Peter. (2015). Research Productivity at Flagship African Universities. [Retrieved in: http://www.universityworldnews.com].
Mizell, H. (2010). Why Professional Development Matters. [Retrieved: www.learningforward.org].
Okiki, O. Ch. (2013). Research productivity of teaching faculty members in Nigerian federal universities: An investigative study. Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 36. [ Retrieved in: http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl36okiki.pd].
Rice, J.K. (2010). The Impact of Teacher Experience: Examining the Evidence and Policy Implications. [Retrieved in: www.caldercenter.org ] .
Vessuri, H. (2008). The Role of Research in Higher Education: Implications and Challenges
for an Active Contribution to Human and Social Development. [Retrieved in: https://upcommons.upc.edu].
December 2020All Articles