Original article | International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2022, Vol. 13(2) 37-44
Serkan Yıldırım & Hafi̇ze Keser
pp. 37 - 44 | Manu. Number: MANU-2207-01-0005.R1
Published online: June 30, 2022 | Number of Views: 33 | Number of Download: 161
It was designed in the case evaluation pattern included in the qualitative research tradition in order to determine the problems which the scholars serving in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation major program encounters in their courses and the solution recommendations related with these problems. Consisting the study group of in the scholars actively lecturing in Physiotherapy (PT) courses is very important with respect to determine the problems encountered with in the application process, not the problems possible to encountered with in the courses in the scope of physiotherapy and rehabilitation (PTR) program. Accordingly, the data related with the problems and the solution recommendations for these problems, which are experienced during this process by the lecturers, was taken through an open-ended questionnaire. The problems encountered by the lecturers serving in the PTR program, who participated in the research, in their classes and the solution recommendations related with these problems were determined by analyzing the answers they gave to the open-ended questions. It was found out as a result of the analyses made that the lecturers deal with the problems related with the courses in two subdimensions as the problems for the interaction in the learning environment and the problems experienced for the PT curriculum and contents and that they offer solution recommendations accordingly.
Keywords: physiotherapy and rehabilitation, physiotherapist training, learning and teaching environment, learning and teaching process, problems
|How to Cite this Article?|
APA 6th edition
Chicago 16th edition
Algun C. (2013). Fizyoterapi eğitiminde bilinmeyenler. Sağlık Düşüncesi ve Tıp Kültürü Dergisi, 27(1), 22-5.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research for Education to Theory and Methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Erden A, Cavlak U, & Turhan K. (2017). Türkiye’de fizyoterapi eğitimi memnuniyet düzeyi. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 28(2), 73-85.
Erel, S., Taşvuran Horata, E., Cavlak, U., Çınar, M. A., Soysal Tomruk, M., Katırcı Kırmacı, Z. İ., ... & Algun, Z. C. (2019). Türkiye'de lisans eğitimi veren fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon okullarındaki son sınıf öğrencilerinin mesleki farkındalık düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 30(3), 199-205.
FTRÇEP (2016). Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Ulusal Çekirdek Eğitim Programı. Ankara. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Ulusal-cekirdek-egitimi-programlari/fizyotreapi_cekirdek_egitim_programi.pdf
Imanipour, M., Sadooghiasl, A., Ghiyasvandian, S., & Haghani, H. (2015). Evaluating the Educational Environment of a Nursing School by Using the DREEM Inventory. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(4), 211-216.
Jensen, G. M., & Mostrom, E. (2012). Handbook of Teaching for Physical Therapists- E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Gürses, H. N., Alemdaroğlu, İ., Tanrıverdi, M. (2014). Türkiye’de fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon fakülte bölümü/yüksekokullarının incelenmesi ve müfredat analizi. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 25(1), 16-27.
Karaali, H. K., Ilgın, D., Özcan, Ö & Seçer, E. (2021). Analysis of Measurement and Evaluation Methods in Undergraduate Education According to the Core Education Program: Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Example. Tepecik Eğit. ve Araşt. Hast. Dergisi 30(3), 288-93.
Karim, J., Al-Halabi, B., Marwan, Y., Sadeq, H., Dawas, A., Al-Abdulrazzaq, D. (2015). The Educational Environment of the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum at Kuwait University. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 6, 297–303.
Kınıklı, G. İ., Erden, A. Çavlak, U., Z Erden. Fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon eğitiminde simülasyon uygulamaları. Turkiye Klinikleri Medical Education-Special Topics, 2(2), 104-10.
Lee, J., & Park, O. (2008). Adaptive instructional systems (3nd ed.). In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J.v. Merrienboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 469-484). New York: Taylor Francis.
Rotthoff, T., Ostapczuk, M. S., De Bruin, J., Decking, U., Schneider, M., Ritz-Timme, S. (2011). Assessing the Learning Environment of A Faculty: Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure with Students and Teachers. Medical Teacher, 33(11), 624-636.
Røe, Y., Rowe, M., Ødegaard, N. B., Sylliaas, H., & Dahl-Michelsen, T. (2019). Learning with technology in physiotherapy education: Design, implementation and evaluation of a flipped classroom teaching approach. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 291.
Tavşancıl. E., & Aslan. E. A. (2001). İçerikanaiizi ve Uygulama Örnekleri. Ankara: Epsilon Yayınları.
Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeking-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research. (Ed.) E. W. Eisner. & A. Peshkin Quantitative Inquiry in Education the Coutinuing Debate (121-152). New York: Teachers Collage Press.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Biiimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (6Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
June 2022All Articles